Model of Magnetic Field

Solenoid Field

We consider a longitudinal solenoid field with an axial symmetry:

a math image

B_z(s)= \left\{\begin{array}{lc} 0, & s<-f/2\\ B_0(s/f+1/2), & -f/2\le s \le f/2\\ B_0, & f/2<s \end{array}\right.\ , }}

where a math image is the length of the fringe. The associated vector potentials for a math image are

a math image
a math image
a math image

where the terms with a math image-functions are necessary in order to satisfy the Maxwell equations, while keeping the axial symmetry. The magnetic field derived from the a math image-function terms in a math image and a math image are

a math image
a math image
a math image

Thus the changes in momenta due to these fields at a math image are

a math image
a math image

where we have used a math image and a math image. The equations of motion a math image and a math image are derived from a Hamiltonian:

a math image

D=\frac{B_0}{16fp}(x^2+y^2)(xp_y-yp_x)\left[\delta(s+f/2)-\delta(s-f/2)\right] . }}

Solution

The fringe field has at least two effects, linear and nonlinear. The linear effect is caused by the first terms in Eqs. a math image and a math image that are linear in a math image and a math image. We can expect that such linear effects can be expressed by a model with hard edges sliced along a math image, if the number of slices is sufficiently large. Thus here we concentrate on the nonlinear effects that are caused by the a math image-function terms in Eqs. a math image and a math image, or their Hamitonian.

Let us obtain the transformation associated with the nonlinear terms up to the first order of a math image. It is expressed as

a math image

\exp(:-f/2:)\exp(:-\delta:)\exp(:f:)\exp(:\delta:)\exp(:-f/2:)\ , }}

where a math image is a drift-back by a distance a math image, and a math image is the nonlinear term at a math image, etc. Then the transformation (trans) is approximated as

a math image

\begin{pmatrix} x_1\\p_{x1}\\y_1\\p_{y1}\end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix} x_0+b\left(2p_{x0}x_0y_0-p_{y0}(x_0^2-y_0^2)\right)/8p^2\\ p_{x0}+b\left(2p_{x0}p_{y0}x_0-(p_{x0}^2-p_{y0}^2)y_0\right)/8p^2\\ y_0-b\left(2p_{y0}x_0y_0+p_{x0}(x_0^2-y_0^2)\right)/8p^2\\ p_{y0}-b\left(2p_{x0}p_{y0}y_0+(p_{x0}^2-p_{y0}^2)x_0\right)/8p^2 \end{pmatrix}\ , }}

where a math image, up to the first order of a math image. The transformation (apptrans) is expressed as a math image with a Hamiltonian:

a math image

H=-\frac{b}{8p^2}(xp_y-yp_x)(xp_x+yp_y)\ . }} It is interesting that the transformation (apptrans) and thus the Hamiltonian (hami) are independent on the length of fringe, a math image.

To solve Hamiltonian eq., it is convenient to use another set of variables:

a math image

\begin{pmatrix} r\\ p_r\\ \varphi\\ p_\varphi\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} \log(x^2+y^2)/2\\xp_x+yp_y \\ \tan^{-1}(y/x)\\ xp_y-yp_x\end{pmatrix}\ , }} which is generated by a generating function:

a math image

G(x,p_r,y,p_\varphi)=\frac{\log(x^2+y^2)}{2}p_r+\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{y}{x}\right)p_\varphi\ . }} Then the Hamiltonian is rewritten as

a math image

H=-\frac{b}{8p^2}p_\varphi p_r\ . }}

The transformation with this hamiltonian is simply written as:

a math image

\begin{pmatrix} r_1\\ \varphi_1 \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}r_0-bp_\varphi/8p^2\\ \varphi_0-bp_r/8p^2\end{pmatrix}\ , }} where a math image and a math image are constant.


トップ   差分 バックアップ リロード   一覧 検索 最終更新   ヘルプ   最終更新のRSS
Last-modified: 2010-01-04 (月) 19:54:27